Overview

Alojamento Local Santo Tirso

Praça D. Pedro IV Rossio 18, 3º 4º, 1100-200 Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
+351 213 470 428

Call

+351 213 470 428

Overall guest ratings

6.1/10 Good
Based on 590 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.5
  • 9.4
  • 3.3
  • 3.2

Nearby

    show all

    About

    The Pensão Santo Tirso is a low budget central hotel in Lisbon ideal to discover the rich history and the vibrant nightlife of the capital of Portugal. Located in the famous Praca Dom Pedro IV commonly known as Rossio, this magnificent square is the heart of the social life of the city. Due to its location this Lisbon accommodation is perfect for travellers looking for a great value-for-money hotel to have a great stay in Lisbon. The subway and bus stops are just outside the hotel which is perfect to visit all the sites of historic interest. The Pensão Santo Tirso is housed in a colonial building that reflects the typical architectural Portuguese style. The hotel offers laundry service, a luggage room and a living room with TV.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.1 Good
    Based on 590 reviews
    • 9.5 "Excellent value."
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 90%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
      5.7 "57% thought the management was tolerable."
    • 5.3 "Internet is average."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      3.7 "63% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.3 "77% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.7 "93% had problems with the shower."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.7 "For 83%, the rooms looked old."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.0 "100% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.8 "62% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.0 "For 90%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 1.6 "Horrible vibe."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.0 "For 90%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% criticized the plain hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.1 Good
    Based on 395 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 9.4 "Excellent value."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
    • 5.2 "Internet is average."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      3.8 "62% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.5 "95% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% said rooms were small."
      3.8 "62% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.6 "84% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 69%."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      1.7 "For 83%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.5 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.3 "77% thought it was too noisy."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.7 "83% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 69%."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.9 "61% complained about the elevator."
      1.2 "For 88%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 1.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.2 "For 88%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    Based on 76 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.8 "62% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.4 "Horrible vibe."

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    Based on 118 reviews
    • 9.5 "Excellent value."
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
    • 3.7 "Not very clean."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were dirty."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      0.9 "91% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.2 "78% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.9 "61% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map