Overview

Hotel Le Strasbourg

17, avenue de Colmar, 68100 Mulhouse, Alsace, France
+33 3 89 36 54 70

RM 194+

Overall guest ratings

7.1/10 Good
Based on 1,529 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 7.9
  • 4.7
  • 3.7

Good to know

  • Accessible parking
  • Affordable parking
  • Near city centre

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Hotel Le Strasbourg, entirely renovated in 2006, offers a welcome of quality in a beautiful building located in the center of Mulhouse, close to 3 borders in the heart of the industrial and scenic French Alsace region. The hotel lies on the city's main street which has become semi-pedestrian in 2006 and has 2 entries: one from the avenue de Colmar, near the hotel reception and the other from the rue du Ballon to the hotel inner yard. For a pleasant stay, Le Strasbourg hotel has a calm and spacious breakfast and meeting room overlooking the beautiful trees in the inner yard and features 48 calm and well equipped rooms with a good value for money. Wireless Internet access is available and subject to charges (€1,50 for 24 hours). Please note that dogs are not allowed.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Express check out
    • Free parking
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 1,529 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      8.8 "Great parking, according to 88%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      9.9 "99% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 7.9 "High value."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% said the reception staff was great."
      8.0 "80% thought the service was very professional."
      7.9 "Management was excellent, said 79%."
    • 5.5 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 78%."
      3.6 "64% had problems with the shower."
      1.9 "81% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.5 "For 75%, the rooms looked old."
      3.0 "70% found problems with the furniture."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.7 "Disappointing food."
      2.5 "75% found the side dishes unedible."
      4.2 "58% did not enjoy the desserts."
      1.0 "90% said the pork dishes didn't taste good."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.1 "79% criticized the plain hotel."
      0.6 "For 94%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      1.0 "90% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.7 "Terrible amenities."
      1.3 "87% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.2 "88% complained about the elevator."
      1.0 "90% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.6 "For 94%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 1.3 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.5 "95% thought it was overpriced."
      4.5 "55% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 581 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      8.8 "Great parking, according to 88%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      9.8 "98% thought parking was inexpensive."
    • 8.0 "Good value."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      7.9 "79% said the reception staff was great."
      8.4 "84% thought the service was very professional."
      7.2 "Management was excellent, said 72%."
    • 5.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.4 "66% had problems with the shower."
      2.2 "78% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      2.8 "72% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.3 "Disappointing food."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.8 "82% criticized the plain hotel."
    • 1.8 "Terrible amenities."
      1.3 "87% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.2 "88% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.5 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.6 "94% thought it was overpriced."
      4.5 "55% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 718 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      8.8 "Great parking, according to 88%."
      9.9 "99% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "81% said the reception staff was great."
    • 8.0 "Good value."
    • 6.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      3.4 "66% had problems with the shower."
      2.5 "For 75%, the rooms looked old."
      3.5 "65% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.7 "Disappointing food."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.7 "Terrible amenities."
      1.3 "87% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.3 "87% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.4 "96% thought it was overpriced."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.3 Good
    Based on 229 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      8.9 "Great parking, according to 89%."
      9.9 "99% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."
    • 7.5 "High value."
    • 5.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."
      5.4 "Beds were acceptable for 54%."
      5.8 "Only 58% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 4.1 "Disappointing food."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
    • 2.0 "Terrible amenities."
      1.2 "88% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.4 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.6 "94% thought it was overpriced."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Accessible parking"
    "Affordable parking"
    "Near city centre"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map