Overview

The Zon All Suites Residences

161-D, Jalan Ampang, 50450, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur 50450, Malaysia
+60 321 648 000

RM 163+

Overall guest ratings

7.1/10 Good
Based on 3,568 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.3
  • 7.3
  • 4.7
  • 4.5

Nearby

    show all

    About

    The ZON All Suites Residences puts you in a great location, within a 15-minute walk of Petronas Twin Towers and Suria KLCC Shopping Centre. The outdoor pool is a great spot to take a dip, and guests can grab a bite to eat at Terracotta Restaurant, which serves local cuisine and is open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. A fitness center and a children's pool are offered, and rooms get the details right with comfy beds and bathrobes.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Business centre
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Outdoor pool
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Sauna
    • Free parking
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Concierge service
    • Coffee shop
    • Child pool
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Pets not allowed
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 3,568 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.3 "City centre within easy reach, said 93%."
      9.3 "93% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 7.3 "High comfort."
      9.2 "92% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.7 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "56% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.0 "Only 60% thought the service was professional."
      6.9 "Only 69% were satisfied with the booking process."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were dirty."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.5 "95% found problems with the furniture."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.4 "86% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.5 "55% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.5 "Internet is poor."
      4.1 "59% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.4 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.8 "92% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.8 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.4 "86% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "Unclean dining area, according to 100%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 713 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 94%."
    • 7.3 "High comfort."
      9.3 "93% thought rooms were spacious."
      8.0 "80% liked the big bathroom."
    • 7.0 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.8 "Service is ok."
      5.8 "58% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 4.6 "Internet is poor."
      4.2 "58% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were dirty."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.5 "95% found problems with the furniture."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.3 "87% complained about the elevator."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.4 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were dirty."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 1.4 "Horrible vibe."
      0.8 "92% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 2,212 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      7.0 "Great parking, according to 70%."
      9.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 94%."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      8.4 "84% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "Hotel security was great, thought 77%."
    • 6.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.5 "Food is average."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were dirty."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.5 "95% found problems with the furniture."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      4.5 "55% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.6 "84% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.7 "Internet is poor."
      4.3 "57% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.8 "92% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.3 "87% complained about the elevator."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.7 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were dirty."
      3.2 "68% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.6 "84% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 1.3 "Horrible vibe."
      0.8 "92% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      4.9 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 51%."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 249 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 8.5 "Good value."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      8.4 "84% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.4 "High comfort."
      9.1 "91% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 6.9 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.4 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.8 "Internet is poor."
    • 3.6 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.7 "Horrible vibe."
      0.7 "93% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 392 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 7.2 "High comfort."
      9.3 "93% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 6.5 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
      6.0 "60% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 5.3 "Food is average."
    • 4.8 "Internet is poor."
      4.4 "56% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "94% found problems with the furniture."
      1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.5 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were dirty."
    • 1.4 "Horrible vibe."
      0.7 "93% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    carpet old dirty
    carpet old dirty
    old and dirty
    klcc
    large apartments
    non smoking room
    smelled of vomit
    cigarette smell
    dirty and bad smell
    non-smoking room available
    bad smell
    small lift
    non-smoking floors
    old bit
    construction lots
    clearly mentioned
    More
    More
    Photos
    Map

    Map